Publication Decision
Posted: August 13, 2012 Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: academic editors, managing editor, manuals, workflow Leave a comment » Time to completion Next editorial meeting after completion of review process. Responsibility Academic editors Action required Deciding whether or not submission is to be accepted, rejected, provisionally accepted pending revision, or invited to resubmit after significant revision Deciding on what revisions (if any will be required) Deciding on comments to be sent to author. Background […]Publication Decision
Posted: August 13, 2012 Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: academic editors, managing editor, manuals, workflow Leave a comment » Time to completion Next editorial meeting after completion of review process. Responsibility Academic editors Action required Deciding whether or not submission is to be accepted, rejected, provisionally accepted pending revision, or invited to resubmit after significant revision Deciding on what revisions (if any will be required) Deciding on comments to be sent to author. Background [...]Receipt Process
Posted: August 13, 2012 Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: managing editor, manuals, receipt process, Tutorials, workflow Leave a comment » Time to completion Maximum 7 days from submission. Responsibility Managing editor Action required Email to author (cc’d to editor in chief) Thanking author for submission Introducing yourself as the journal’s managing editor (and your term of office) Outlining the review process and broad timelines {{Link to sample email}} Background and further details Each Journal in [...]Receipt Process
Posted: August 13, 2012 Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: managing editor, manuals, receipt process, Tutorials, workflow Leave a comment » Time to completion Maximum 7 days from submission. Responsibility Managing editor Action required Email to author (cc’d to editor in chief) Thanking author for submission Introducing yourself as the journal’s managing editor (and your term of office) Outlining the review process and broad timelines {{Link to sample email}} Background and further details Each Journal in [...]Review decision
Posted: August 13, 2012 Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: academic editors, manuals, workflow Leave a comment » Time to completion Next editorial meeting after the pre-review recommendation. Responsibility Academic editor/Editorial team Action required Decide whether article is ready for review (If yes) Assign a member of the Academic editorial team to oversee the article’s progress through the review process Provide an initial list of potential referees. Background and further details On the [...]The incubator workflow
Posted: July 9, 2012 Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: contracts, editor, managing editor, manuals, News, processes, scientific editor, workflow Leave a comment » This is an outline (seen from the point of view of the scientific editor of a journal) of our standard workflow.The incubator workflow
Posted: July 9, 2012 Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: contracts, editor, managing editor, manuals, News, processes, scientific editor, workflow Leave a comment » This is an outline (seen from the point of view of the scientific editor of a journal) of our standard workflow.Fixing a problem with broken stylesheets in OJS 2.3.6
Posted: June 18, 2012 Filed under: Applications, Digital Humanities, OJS, Research, Scholarly publishing | Tags: html, OJS, Open Journal Systems, proofing, scholarly publishing, Tips, workflow Leave a comment »In recent days, we have encountered a problem at Digital Studies/Le champ numérique that has resulted in problems with the display of a number of our articles.
The symptom is that the article breadcrumb and menu bar appear below rather than beside the right navigation bar, as illustrated below.
Screen shot showing layout problem. Article on left shows the broken style; article on the right has had the problem corrected.
After some investigation, we narrowed the problem down to an issue with how OJS handles HTML-encoded articles. Read the rest of this entry »
Well that’s that. Solving (?) the VC model and workflow
Posted: December 1, 2015 | Author: dpod | Filed under: Research-and-comment, visionary-cross | Tags: data model, digital libraries, editions, joris van zundert, peter boot, visionary cross, workflow | Leave a comment »Yesterday, Dot Porter, one of the leads on the Visionary Cross project visited Lethbridge for a project meeting (and to speak to my DH class). The main purpose of her meeting was to plan the work that needs to happen on the Digital Library side of the project.
This is a core issue for us. As we say on the front page:
The important things here are that it is an archive-edition: it is data-centric, distributed, Read the rest of this entry »