In an earlier post today, I discussed some of the economic implications of having a last name beginning early in the alphabet in disciplines that traditionally order the authors on multi-author papers alphabetically.
I’ve since looked up the original paper (Einav, Liran, and Leeat Yariv. 2006. “What’s in a Surname? The Effects of Surname Initials on Academic Success.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 20 (1): 175–88). This is more startling than I thought.
First of all, from the authors’ own description:Read the rest of this entry »
A is for Aardvark and author. The economic implications of having a last name with an early letter in the alphabetPosted: July 26, 2014 | | In many disciplines, when more than one researcher contributes to a paper, the authors are listed in terms of the relative contribution: the first author is assumed to have done the most work, the second the second most, and so on until the last position, which is often as prestigious as first. In other disciplines, however, the tradition is to order author names alphabetically. This can be unfair to authors whose names come later in the alphabet, because citation conventions for multiple author contributions usually spell out the names of only the first two or three authors. But it turns out it can also have career and financial implications. As Marusic, Bosnjak, et al. (see?) report: Read the rest of this entry »
I think it is time to get rid of authorship altogether, at least in research communication.